Decoherence of Quantum States  

In General > s.a. interpretations of quantum mechanics; models of decoherence; quantum chaos; vacuum.
* Idea: The evolution of a pure state into an effectively mixed one due to system-bath interaction; An important concept in the emergence of classical behavior from quantum states for macroscopic systems; Decoherence destroys quantum correlations and interference in Wigner distributions and washes out fine structure in classical distributions, bringing the two distributions and the expectation values closer together.
* Decoherence function: The function d(,) measures the quantum interference between history propositions and .
* Decoherence time scale: d is the time over which quantum coherence of the system is lost.
* Proposal (Kay): Based on a unitary framework for quantum gravity, assumes that the operators tied to the gravitational degrees of freedom are unobservable and equates physical entropy with matter-gravity entanglement entropy.

Related Topics > s.a. arrow of time; experiments in quantum mechanics; probability; quantum effects [quantum jumps].
* Origin of decoherence: It is often attributed to the system-environment entanglement, which is not the only source of decoherence.
* And classicality: Weinstein suggests that decoherence is best regarded as explaining the persistence of true classicality, rather than the emergence of quasiclassicality.
* Quantum darwinism: The redundant recording of information about a decohering system by its environment.
@ Decoherence-free subspace: Mundarain & Orszag qp/06 [two-level system in squeezed bath]; Brooke et al PRA(08)-a0806 [N qubits]; > s.a. stochastic processes [Markov].
@ Quantum darwinism: Blume-Kohout & Zurek PRL(08)-a0704 [in brownian motion].
@ And pilot-wave interpretation: Sanz & Borondo EPJD(07)qp/03 [decoherence does not imply classical limit].
@ And measurement: Namiki et al 98; Schlosshauer RMP(04); d'Espagnat FP(05) [and Wigner's friend]; > s.a. types of measurements.
@ Self-induced: Castagnino & Lombardi IJTP(03)qp/02 [in cosmology], SHPMP(04) [general]; Schlosshauer PRA(05)qp [spin bath model]; Castagnino & Lombardi PRA(05)qp [time], PhSc(05)dec [and classical limit]; Castagnino qp/05 [non-integrable systems].
@ And classicality: Weinstein a0807 [emergence of classicality is not generic]; Romanelli PRA(09)-a0905 [without classicality, resonant quantum kicked rotor]; Kofler et al a0906 [no continuous spatiotemporal description]; Weinstein a0906 [decoherence as persistence of classicality].
@ And Lorentz invariance: Milburn PRA(91), gq/03, NJP(06); Bertlmann qp/04-in [particle physics]; Cai et al PRA(07) [suppressed dephasing].
@ Time scale: Terra Cunha et al qp/04; Dalton JMO(05)qp/04 [macroscopic systems]; Roa et al PLA(07) [stability]; > s.a. wave-function collapse.
@ Thermodynamic limit: Lugiewicz & Olkiewicz JPA(02) [spin system]; Frasca PLA(03)qp/02; Frasca in(05)cm/04 [fully polarized states].
@ Types / sources of decoherence: Anastopoulos & Hu CQG(08)-a0803 [intrinsic/fundamental decoherence]; Çetinbas JPA(09) [coherent quantum fluctuations].
@ Other topics: Schulman PRA(98)qp/97 [interaction with walls, and error]; Halliwell PRD(99)qp [fate of information]; Omnès qp/01 [as irreversible process]; Camacho IJMPD(01)gq [equivalence principle violations]; Frasca PLA(01), PLA(03) [in thermodynamic limit]; Mohrhoff qp/01 [meaning]; Berman et al PRA(04)qp [survival of quantum properties]; Schützhold & Tiersch qp/04 [and Casimir effect]; Alicki OSID(04)-a0801 [pure decoherence without dissipation], qp/05-in [decoherence control]; Halliwell PRA(05) [commuting X and P, emergent classicality]; Castagnino et al a0907 [effect of random coupling coefficients].

References > s.a. entanglement; histories-based quantum mechanics.
@ Reviews: Zurek PT(91)qp/03, & Paz NCB(95); Zeh qp/95-in; Giulini et al 96; Zurek PTRS(98)qp; Joos qp/99-in [environmental]; Anastopoulos IJTP(02)qp/00; Zurek RMP(03)qp/01; Joos et al 03; O'Connell qp/05-in; Halliwell CP(05)qp; Zeh in(06)qp/05; Schlosshauer 07 [r PT(08)sep].
@ Pedagogical: Haroche PT(98)jul; Bhattacharya et al LAS(02)qp/04; Finkelstein qp/05 [energy decoherence]; Hornberger LNP(08)qp/06-ln; Gamble & Lindner AJP(09).
@ General theory: Joos & Zeh ZPB(85), Joos in(86) [environmental]; Omnès PRA(97); Wright CMP(98) [decoherence functionals]; Vecchi qp/00 [assumptions]; Fiete & Heller PRA(03)qp/02 [semiclassical]; Blanchard et al PLA(03) [various effects]; Na & Wyatt PS(03) [hydrodynamic formulation]; Znidaric & Prosen JOB(05)qp [t-dependence]; Castagnino & Laura qp/05, et al qp/06 [formalism for open and closed systems]; Merkli et al PRL(07); Gamble a0805-th; Castagnino et al PhSc(07)dec, a0907 [general framework]; Gorin et al NJP(08)-a0807 [random-matrix theory].
@ Related topics: Morikawa PRD(90); Finkelstein PRD(93)gq; Twamley PRD(93)gq; Zurek & Paz PRL(94)gq; Unruh & Wald PRD(95)ht [causality or energy-momentum conservation]; Gell-Mann & Hartle in(98)gq/95; Anglin et al PRA(97)qp/96; Dugic PS(96); Kiefer & Joos qp/98-in; Paz & Zurek qp/00-ln; Scherer & Soklakov qp/04 [long histories].
@ Conceptual: Zeh qp/96, qp/99-in; Stamp SHPMP(06).
@ Phase space picture: Kiefer qp/97, Diósi qp/02-in, Ozorio de Almeida JPA(03) [Wigner functions]; Grewal PRA(02) [and coherent states].

Decoherence is like capitalism. Its proponents regard it as obvious, given human nature, and its success seems overwhelming. Competitors largely belong to the past, or get the impression they do. Consequently, although serious analysis finds deep flaws in it, the promise of huge benefits continues to attract new adherents with the naivety of those who enroll in a pyramid scheme. – N P Landsman SHPMP(09)


main pageabbreviationsjournalscommentsother sitesacknowledgements
send feedback and suggestions to bombelli at olemiss.edu – modified 17 oct 2009