|  Constrained Systems | 
In General > s.a. lagrangian dynamics
  / types of constrained systems.
  * Lagrangian form:
    They arise when the momenta obtained from varying the action are not all
    independent functions of (qi,
    q·i),
    e.g., some vanish; If we don't add the appropriate N(constraint) to H
    in the Legendre transformation, we don't get the most general possible motion.
  * Hamiltonian form: We first
    determine the constraints (primary, φa
    first-class, φm second-class,
    secondary ψi and
    ψi) from the
    Lagrangian formulation; To determine the dynamics, either (a) Modify the
    Hamiltonian \(H = p\,\dot q - L\) to
H = p q· + ∑a λa φa + ∑m Um φm − L ;
Here, the λs are arbitrary Lagrange multipliers, and the Us are determined by consistency; or (b) Use \(H = p\,\dot q - L\) and the Dirac bracket
df / dt = {H, f}D = {H, f} + ∑a λa {φa, f} + ∑M, N {H, KM} CMN {KN, f} .
  * Remark: If pA
    = 0 and pB = A,
    then those constraints just tell us that A and B are canonically
    conjugate.
  * Symplectic form: A constraint
    for a system with a phase space Γ is a subset Γ' of Γ such that
    all physical states have to be in Γ'; It can be specified by the vanishing of
    some functions Ci, i
    = 1, ..., r on Γ.
Reduction
  * Idea: The process by
    which a theory with constraints and redundant/non-physical variables is
    rewritten as an equivalent unconstrained one, without redundant variables,
    or the separation of the variables in a theory into true degrees of freedom
    and gauge degrees of freedom; It can be achieved by solving the constraints,
    or by fixing the gauge if appropriate.
  * Faddeev-Jackiw approach:
    An approach in which constraints are solved; Formally, an approach in which
    gauge and reparametrization symmetries are generated by the null eigenvectors
    of the sympletic matrix and not by constraints, which provides a way of
    dealing systematically with hidden symmetries even when the constraints
    do not act as the generators of the corresponding transformations.
  * Different approaches: The
    Dirac and Faddeev-Jackiw approaches are equivalent when the constraints are
    effective, but when some are ineffective the Faddeev-Jackiw approach may
    lose some constraints or some equations of motion; The inequivalence may be
    related to the failure of the Dirac conjecture in this case; An alternative
    to both of those approaches is to fix a gauge.
  @ General references: Cariñena et al IJGMP(07)-a0709-conf [rev];
    Falceto et al NCC(13)-a1309,
    NCC(13)-a1309 [classical and quantum systems, using Lie-Jordan algebras].
  @ Faddeev-Jackiw approach: in Sudarshan & Mukunda 75;
    Faddeev & Jackiw PRL(88);
    refs in Seiler JPA(95);
    Wotzasek AP(95)ht [and Polyakov 2D induced gravity];
    García & Pons IJMPA(97),
    IJMPA(98)ht [compared to Dirac approach, gauge theories];
    Natividade et al PRD(99) [examples];
    > s.a. symmetries in quantum theories.
  @ Other approaches:
    Banerjee & Barcelos-Neto AP(98) [reducible systems];
    Marciniak & Blaszak RPMP(05) [geometric reduction];
    Attard et al a1702 [dressing field method].
References
  > s.a. classical mechanics; hamiltonian dynamics
  [symmetries]; lagrangian systems; observables.
  @ Books: Hanson et al 76;
    Sundermeyer 82;
    Papastavridis 14.
  @ General: Śniatycki AIHP(74);
    Román-Roy IJTP(88);
    Cariñena FdP(90);
    Lusanna JMP(90),
    PRP(90),
    RNC(91);
    Charap ed-95;
    Pons & Shepley CQG(95)gq;
    Tulczyjew in(03)mp/06 [holonomic];
    Randono CQG(08)-a0802 [Lagrangian form, and generally covariant systems];
    Deriglazov JMP(09)-a0901 [and symmetries];
    Date a1010-ln [intro]; Errasti et al a2007 [first-order field theories, including gravity].
  @ Hamiltonian form: Dirac PRS(58);
    Shanmugadhasan JMP(73);
    Gogilidze et al IJMPA(89);
    Barbashov ht/01-conf [and Lagrangian];
    Gitman & Tyutin NPB(02)ht [from Lagrangian];
    Duplij in(09)-a0804 [Legendre transform without Lagrange multipliers, Clairaut equation];
    Bekaert & Park EPJC(09)-a0902 [rev];
    Rothe & Rothe 10;
    Cendra et al a1106 [Poisson-algebraic and geometric points of view];
    Chandre JPA(13)-a1303 [Casimir invariants and the Jacobi identity];
    Allen & Matzner a2007 [Dirac formalism, rev];
    > s.a. types of constrained systems.
  @ Hamiltonian form, history:
    Salisbury phy/06-proc [Bergmann],
    MGXI(08)phy/07 [Rosenfeld];
    Salisbury & Sundermeyer EPJH(17)-a1606 [Rosenfeld].
  @ And gauge symmetries: Stoilov ht/06 [re gauge algebra];
    Banerjee & Roy PRD(11) [Poincaré and Hamiltonian gauge symmetries].
  @ Lagrange multipliers:
    Cariñena & Rañada JPA(93);
    Montani & Montemayor PRD(98) [symplectic structure];
    Karabulut EJP(06) [physical meaning];
    Mazars JPA(07) [analytic computation].
  @ Dynamics, meaning: Uwadia & Kalaba PRS(92),
    s.a. Bucy PRS(94);
    Grundling & Hurst JMP(98)ht/97 [constraints not preserved];
    Gràcia et al mp/00,
    Massa et al IJGMP(15)-a1503 [variational principles and geometry];
    Udwadia & Phohomsiri PRS(07),
    PRS(07) [Poincaré equations of motion].
  @ Approaches:
    Sardanashvily mp/00-conf [polysymplectic];
    Gitman & Tyutin NPB(02);
    de León et al mp/02 [field theories];
    Díaz & Montesinos JMP(18)-a1710
      [field theory, geometric Lagrangian approach to counting the physical degrees of freedom].
  @ Related topics: Pavlov & Starinetz TMP(95) [phase space geometry];
    Marmo et al JPA(97) [as implicit differential equations];
    Sheikh-Jabbari & Shirzad EPJC(01)ht/99 [and boundary conditions];
    Bojowald & Strobl RVMP(03))ht/01 [Poisson geometry];
    Rothe PLB(03)ht [dynamics from limit of unconstrained];
    Di Bartolo et al JMP(05)gq/04 [discretizations];
    > s.a. hamilton-jacobi theory; noether's
      theorem; symmetries.
 main page
  – abbreviations
  – journals – comments
  – other sites – acknowledgements
  send feedback and suggestions to bombelli at olemiss.edu – modified 23 jul 2020