|  Asymptotic Flatness at Spatial Infinity | 
In General
  > s.a. ADM formulation; canonical general relativity;
  initial-value formulation; multipole moments
  \ solutions of general relativity.
  * Idea: One gets information
    on conserved quantities of spacetime, but there are no equations, the dynamics
    is not recorded.
  * History: It took about ten
    years more to develop than the structure at \(\cal I\), mainly because of the
    intricate differentiable structure; 2016, Supertranslations are used to prove
    that black holes can have soft hair.
  @ Early work: in Lichnerowicz 39 [for stationary spacetimes].
  @ General references: Geroch JMP(72),
    in(77);
    Sommers JMP(78);
    Ashtekar in(80),
    FP(85);
    Beig & Schmidt CMP(82);
    Ashtekar & Magnon JMP(84);
    Beig PRS(84);
    Winicour FP(85);
    Chruściel JMP(89),
    JMP(89);
    Petrov IJMPD(95),
    IJMPD(97);
    Hayward PRD(03)gq;
    Compère & Dehouck CQG(11)-a1106 [without imposing parity conditions];
    Henneaux & Troessaert a1904 [rev];
    Ali Mohamed & Valiente Kroon a2103 [comparison of Ashtekar's and Friedrich's formalisms].
  @ With symmetries: Beig GRG(80) [static];
    Beig & Simon GRG(80),
    Kennefick & Ó Murchadha CQG(95)gq/93 [stationary];
    Beig & Chruściel JMP(96)gq/95;
    Prabhu & Shehzad CQG(20)-a1912 [asymptotic symmetries and charges];
    > s.a. initial-value formulation.
  @ Existence: Reula CMP(89);
    Lindblad & Rodnianski CMP(05)m.AP/03 [wave coordinates].
  @ Numerical: Husa AIP(00)gq/01;
    Zenginoğlu JPCS(07)gq/06.
  @ Other:
    Friedrich CMP(88) [radiativity condition];
    Ashtekar & Romano CQG(92) [i0 as boundary];
    Thiemann CQG(95)gq/93 [Ashtekar variables];
    Herberthson CQG(98)gq/97 [diff];
    Finster & Kraus CJM(05)m.DG/03 [curvature estimates];
    Shiromizu & Tomizawa PRD(04)gq,
    Tanabe et al JMP(09)-a0902 [higher dimensions];
    Henneaux & Troessaert JHEP(18)-a1803 [asymptotic symmetries of Maxwell theory],
    JHEP(18)-a1805 [Einstein-Maxwell system];
    Gibbons a1902.
Spi Formalism
  > s.a. Penrose Diagram; Ripple.
  $ Def: A spacetime (M, g)
    is said to be asymptotically flat at spatial infinity if there exists a conformally related
    spacetime (M', g'), which is C∞
    everywhere except at a point i0,
    where M' is C>1 and
    g' is C>0, together with
    an embedding i: M → M, such that
    (1) \(\bar J\)(i0) = M' \ M,
    i.e., i0 is at spatial infinity;
    (2) There exists a conformal factor Ω: M' → \(\mathbb R\),
    C2 at i0,
    C∞ elsewhere, such that 
    g'ab|M
    = Ω2 gab,
    Ω\(|_{i^0}\) = ∇'a Ω\(|_{i^0}\) = 0,
    ∇'a∇'b
    Ω\(|_{i^0}\) = 2 g'ab
    (Ω ~ ρ−2);
    (3) Rab admits a regular
    direction-dependent limit at i0 (matter sources
    fall off like ρ−4).
  * Re boundary conditions: If the
    metric were C1 at i0,
    the mass would vanish; If the metric were C0, the mass
    would not be defined; R'abcd blows up
    at i0, but Ω1/2
    R'abcd →
    Rabcd(η),
    a regular direction-dependent limit; Its Weyl part is coded in the electric
    and magnetic parts, with potentials provided by the Ricci part.
  * Relationships: It
    implies asymptotic flatness at spatial infinity in the ADM sense.
  * Hyperboloid \(\cal D\): The most
    useful construction at spi is the hyperboloid \(\cal D\) of unit timelike vectors,
    the "space of directions of approach to i0";
    It has a natural metric hab
    = gab −
    ηaηb.
  * First-order structure: Universal,
    the C>1 manifold with well-defined tangent
    space and metric.
  * Connections: They correspond to
    equivalence classes of connections on spacetime; They need not always be the same.
  * Higher-order structure: Not
    meaningful, reflected in the fact that the curvature blows up at spi.
  @ References:
    Bergmann & Smith PRD(93) [structure];
    Valiente a0808 [regularity conditions].
Ambiguities > s.a. asymptotic flatness.
  * Non-uniqueness: Equivalent conformal
    completions may be obtained by supertranslations, inequivalent ones by a 4-parameter
    family of logarithmic transformations; If we use Ω' = ω Ω,
    where ω = 1 and C>0 at
    i0, i.e., ω =
    1 + Ω1/2 α, where
    α...; If ω is C0
    at i0, we get an inequivalent completion
    (e.g., related by a log translation).
  * Logarithmic transformations:
    An ambiguity in the choice of flat metric η (in addition to
    supertranslations); If η is one such metric, with Cartesian
    chart xm, then η'
    with x'm:=
    xm
    + Cm ln ρ,
    for all Cm, will also do; In some
    cases there is a preferred or asymptotic frame; In the spi framework, a 4-parameter
    family of inequivalent, logarithmically related completions which give the same
    physical answers, and can be considered as gauge.
  @ Logarithmic transformations:
    Bergmann PR(61);
    Beig & Schmidt CMP(82);
    Ashtekar FP(85).
Symmetries / The Spi Group
  * Idea: The set of all
    diffeomorphisms that leave the spi structure invariant, modulo those
    which generate the identity at i0
    and leave each ripple fixed, \(\cal G\) = \(\cal D\)/I.
  * Structure: Similar
    to the BMS group, a semidirect product of the Lorentz group and the
    supertranslation group; It has a preferred translation subgroup,
    but not a preferred Lorentz (and hence Poincaré) subgroup.
  * Generators: Vector
    fields Xa
    such that at i0,
    Xa
    ∈ C>0 and
    X a
    = 0 (not to move i0),
    ∇'(a
    Xb) = 0
    (not to change the metric, asymptotic Killing vector fields),
    and ∇'a
    ∇'(b
    Xc)
    = ∇'a
    ω g'bc,
    for some ω (= 1 at i0)
    (so X can be associated with some change in conformal factor);
    If ∇a ω = 0,
    then X generates the identity at i0;
    It belongs to I.
  * Remark: X defines a vector
    field on \(\cal D\) by X' a:= lim
    Ω−1/2 X a
    (tangential to \(\cal D\) since ∇(a
    Xb) = 0).
  @ References: Goldberg PRD(90);
    Perng JMP(99)gq/98;
    Lusanna & de Pietri gq/99;
    Szabados CQG(03)gq;
    Dehouck PhD-a1112 [electric and magnetic aspects];
    Troessaert CQG(18)-a1704 [BMS4 algebra as the asymptotic symmetry algebra];
    Henneaux & Troessaert JHEP(18)-a1801 [new boundary conditions and the BMS group].
Energy-Momentum > s.a. ADM formalism;
  energy in general relativity [and generalization].
  $ Def: The energy-momentum component
    along a tangent vector Va at
    i0 is
Va pa = \(1\over8\pi G\)∫C Eab Vb dSa ,
    where Eab
    is the electric part of the Weyl tensor on the hyperboloid
    \(\cal D\) at i0,
    and C is any cross section of \(\cal D\).
  @ Relationship with ADM:
    Śniatycki RPMP(89);
    Huang & Zhang gq/05-proc,
    ScCh(07)gq/06.
 main page
  – abbreviations
  – journals – comments
  – other sites – acknowledgements
  send feedback and suggestions to bombelli at olemiss.edu – modified 6 mar 2021