|  Types of Homology Theories | 
In General > s.a. homology theory.
  * Different coefficients:
    Homology groups using \(\mathbb Q\) or \(\mathbb R\) instead of \(\mathbb Z\)
    contain less information about the topological space; They cannot have any
    torsion subgroup.
  * Simplicial homology:
    Defined for polyhedra, in a simple way; For a general space X, one
    triangulates X with some polyhedron K, and shows that
    \(H_q(K)\) does not depend on K.
  * Singular simplicial homology:
    A generalization of the simplicial one; Instead of triangulating the whole space,
    one just looks at continuous (but possibly "singular", non-invertible)
    maps from simplices into it; More formally, one constructs a functor to the
    category of chain complexes, and from there another one to the Abelian groups.
  * Singular cubical homology:
    Same as singular simplicial homology, but with maps of cubes rather than simplices.
  * Čech homology: Defined using simplices,
    becomes independent of simplices through some limiting procedure.
  @ Singular simplicial homology: Eilenberg AM(44)
      [original paper, topologically-invariant manner].
  @ K-homology: Douglas 80.
  @ Morse homology:
    Banyaga & Hurtubise 04.
  @ Floer homology: Zois ht/05 [non-commutative];
    > s.a. 4-manifolds; non-commutative field theory.
  @ Knot homology: Gukov & Saberi in(14)-a1211-ln [and quantum curves];
    Gorsky a1304 [colored homology of knots];
    Nawata & Oblomkov a1510-proc.
Examples > s.a. causal
  sets [stable homology]; graph invariants;
  networks [persistent homology].
  * Decomposition: In general,
    we can write Hq(K)
    = Gq ⊕ Tq,
    where Gq is free and its rank gives the
    number of (q+1)-dimensional holes in K, the q-th Betti number, while the
    torsion subgrop Tq tells how K is twisted.
  * For manifolds: The
    0-th one is H0(M)
    = \(\mathbb Z\) ⊕ \(\mathbb Z\) ⊕ ... ⊕ \(\mathbb Z\),
    with as many \(\mathbb Z\)s as connected components in M; If M is
    a manifold of dimension n, then Hq(M) = 0,
    for all q > n (this is not true for the πq).
  * For Rn:
    Hm(\(\mathbb R\)n,
    \(\mathbb R\)n \{0}) = δmn\(\mathbb Z\),
    for m > 1.
  * For spheres:
    H1(S1)
    = \(\mathbb Z\) (> s.a. Hurewicz Theorem).
Relative Homology
  * Idea: We take a subpolyhedron
    L of K and consider like the identity anything in K
    belonging to L; Define the following chain complex,
Cp(K;
L):= Cp(K)/Cp(L)
  ,   p > 0 ,   and
  \(\bar\partial\)p: Cp(K; L)
  → Cp−1(K;
  L)   by   \(\bar\partial\)p(cp +
  Cp(L)):= ∂p cp + Cp−1(L)
  ,   cp ∈ Cp(K)
  .
* Motivation: The usefulness lies in the fact that Hp(K) → Hp(L) → Hp(K; L) is an exact sequence.
 main page
  – abbreviations
  – journals – comments
  – other sites – acknowledgements
  send feedback and suggestions to bombelli at olemiss.edu – modified 24 apr 2017