In General > s.a. quantization
of second-class systems; dirac procedure.
* Methods: There are
various methods; The Dirac and reduced phase space formalisms are not equivalent,
but this is not obvious from some of the simplest examples
(like QED without sources); When they differ, the Dirac procedure
seems to be the correct one if the constrained degrees of freedom are in principle
excitable; They are equivalent for cotangent bundle phase spaces with canonical
symplectic
structure
[@ Puta LMP(84)];
When the constraints are power of a linear function (irregular, type II), the
Hamiltonian and Lagrangian descriptions
may be dynamically inequivalent.
Reduced Phase Space
* Idea: Use the space
of orbits of the constraint vector fields on the constraint surface
' as
phase space.
* Example: Consider the
gauge vector field v on
',
with gab vavb =
2
(or
?);
Then, go to the space of orbits of v, on which there is a metric hab;
Wave functions are densities of weight 1/2 on this reduced phase space, and
the Hamiltonian is H = –
2
hab Pa Pb
+ potential; When defining the inner product, the measure should be
1/2 dvh,
not just dvh.
@ References: Blyth & Isham PRD(75)
[applications]; Pons et al JPA(99)mp/98 [theory
for gauge theory]; Chingangbam & Sharan
qp/99 [examples];
Muslih NCB(02)mp/01;
Thiemann CQG(06)gq/04 [and
partial observables]; Anastopoulos gq/04 [geometric
procedure].
Batalin-Vilkovisky, Batalin-Fradkin-Vilkovisky, BRST Methods > s.a.
BRST quantization; symplectic
structures.
* Idea: The BV method is Lagrangian, the BFV method Hamiltonian.
* Fradkin–Vilkovisky
theorem: The Batalin–Fradkin–Vilkovisky
path integral is complete independent of the gauge fixing 'fermion', even
within a nonperturbative context.
@ General references: McMullan JMP(87)
[BFV and Yang-Mills theories]; Browning & McMullan JMP(87)
[BFV for other theories]; Hasiewicz et al JMP(91)
[and Gupta-Bleuler]; Govaerts & Troost CQG(91)
[BFV and Faddeev]; Khudaverdian & Nersessian MPLA(93)
[geometrical]; Batalin & Tyutin IJMPA(96)ht/95 [perturbative
equivalence]; Hüffel ht/02-in
[2-point non-commutative Yang-Mills model]; Dayi IJMPA(04)ht/03 [generalized
fields]; Bashkirov ht/04 [BV,
quadratic
];
Govaerts & Scholtz JPA(04)ht [Fradkin-Vilkovisky
theorem]; Bashkirov et al ht/05 [field
theories, nsc's]; Bashkirov & Sardanashvily ht/06 [and
Ward identities].
@ And geometric quantization: Duval et al CMP(90); Figueroa-O'Farrill & Kimura
CMP(91).
Path Integral Quantization > s.a. Faddeev-Popov;
Ghost Fields; path
integrals.
* First-class: Choose
gauge fixing conditions
i(q, p)
= f i, for fixed f i,
with {
i,
j}
= 0 and det|{C,
}|
0; Then
Z =
Dp Dq
(
i–f i)
(Cj)
det|{C,
}|
exp{ i
dt (p· q – H)}
.
@ General references: Garczynski PLB(87);
Abrikosov PLA(93);
Ferraro et al PLB(94);
Muslih & Güler
NCB(97); Klauder & Shabanov qp/98; Muslih mp/00;
Rabei NCB(00); Klauder LNP(01)ht/00 [rev];
Ohnuki JPA(04)
[particle on D-sphere].
@ Coherent states: Klauder AP(97)qp/96, qp/96,
qp/96;
Klauder & Shabanov PLB(97)ht/96 [including
Yang-Mills]; Junker & Klauder EPJC(98)qp/97,
ht/98-in [with
fermions].
Other Methods > s.a. deformation
quantization [Fedosov,
Moyal].
* Expectation values:
Define as physical states those for which ![]()
|C|![]()
=
0; One drawback is that it is not a linear condition on the states, so it
is not preserved by linear combinations and the solutions don't obey the superposition
principle–they don't form a subspace of
.
* Triplectic: The Sp(2)-covariant
version of the field-antifield quantization
in
the Lagrangian formalism.
@ Expectation values: Marinov FPL(89);
Kheyfets & Miller PRD(95)gq/94.
@ Triplectic: Batalin & Marnelius NPB(96)ht/95;
Geyer et al MPLA(99)ht/98;
Grigoriev
PLB(99) [Lie group structure]; Geyer & Lavrov IJMPA(04)
[general coordinates]; [> s.a.
brst].
@ Faddeev-Jackiw: Faddeev & Jackiw PRL(88);
Barcelos-Neto & Wotzasek MPLA(92), IJMPA(92);
Jackiw ht/93;
Barcelos-Neto & Silva IJMPA(95)
[reducible theory]; Müller-Kirsten & Zhang PLA(95),
PLA(95);
García & Pons IJMPA(98);
> s.a. dirac approach [comparison].
@ Hamilton-Jacobi approach: Baleanu & Güler NCB(99), NCB(00);
Güler
NCB(05).
@ Rieffel induction: Landsman dg/96; Wren JGP(98).
@ Related topics: Dayi PLB(89)
[gauge fixing]; Klauder qp/98-in
[
-dimensional];
Savvidou & Anastopoulos CQG(00)gq/99 [histories
quantization]; Rabei et al PRA(02)
[WKB
approximation, semiclassical]; Little & Klauder PRD(05)gq [second-class
on quantization, model]; Bojowald et al a0804 [effective
constraints].
References > s.a. coherent
states; geometric quantization; quantum
states [semiclassical].
* Remark: Grundling has
proposed a method for obtaining an algebra on reduced phase space, which works
even for classically ergodic systems, where other methods
like
group averaging fail (from Ray).
@ Texts and reviews: Gitman & Tyutin 90; Klauder LNP(01)ht/00;
Grundling RPMP(06) [Grundling, Hurst approach].
@ General: in Ashtekar & Horowitz PRD(82);
Ashtekar & Stillerman JMP(86);
Kuchar PRD(87)
[factor ordering], in(88) [covariant]; Dresse et al PLB(90);
Hájícek
in(94); Klauder qp/96-in;
Kaplan et al PRA(97)qp/98;
Klauder NPB(99)ht;
Corichi CQG(08)-a0801 [geometrical].
@ Related topics: Goldberg et al JMP(91);
Rovelli PRL(98)
[gauge transformations in quantum mechanics];
Lavrov et al MPLA(99)
[osp(1,2) susy]; Facchi et al JOB(04)qp/03 [and
Zeno dynamics];
Konopka & Markopoulou gq/06 [states,
from noiseless subsystems]; > s.a. regularization, superselection, theta
sectors.
Specific Types of Systems > s.a. [quantum
gauge theories]; canonical quantum gravity; Proca
Theory; supergravity.
> Parametrized field
theories:
Torre and Varadarajan showed that for generic foliations emanating from
a flat initial slice in D > 2 spacetimes, scalar field evolution
along arbitrary foliations is not unitarily implemented on the Fock space,
which implies an obstruction to Dirac quantization; The no-go result can
be overcome however using lqg techniques.
@ General references: Banerjee & Chakraborty AP(96)
[Chern-Simons]; Arik & Ünel ht/96 [quadratic C];
Grundling & Hurst JMP(98)
[not preserved by
dynamics]; Montesinos et al PRD(99)gq [general
relativity toy model]; Miskovic & Zanelli JMP(03),
Klauder & Little CQG(06)gq [irregular].
@ Special configuration spaces: Kleinert & Shabanov PLA(97)
[on Sd];
Maraner ht/98 [on
a
line]; Ikemori et al MPLA(99)
[on S2]; Scardicchio PLA(02)
[on S1]; > s.a. quantum
systems.
@ Reparametrization invariant: Klauder JPA(01)qp/00 [ultralocal
fields];
Varadarajan PRD(07)gq/06 [parametrized
field theory]; > s.a. parametrized
theories.
@ Totally constrained: Kodama PTP(95)gq,
PTP(95)gq [classical
and quantum theory]; Doldán
et
al
IJTP(96)ht/94.
@ Generally covariant: Montesinos GRG(01)gq/00 [relational
evolution]; Sforza gq/00-PhD;
> s.a. types of quantum field theories.
@ Time-dependent constraints: Muslih CzJP(02)mp/01 [canonical
path integral].
@ Discrete spacetime lattice: Di Bartolo et al CQG(02)gq.
Main page – Abbreviations – Journals – Comments – Other
sites – Acknowledgements
Send feedback and suggestions to bombelli at olemiss.edu – Modified
20 jun 2008