In General
* Methods of proof: By
contradiction, by construction, by induction, by exhaustion; Disproof by counterexample.
* Constructive vs contradiction:
(Jan Brouwer) If numbers and other mathematical objects do not exist in a Platonic
realm–if they are constructed–then
the
only acceptable existence proofs must be recipes for constructing them;
1960's (Errett A Bishop), Most of classical mathematical
analysis can
be proved constructively–but one has to abandon the idea of
an infinite
set.
* Checking proofs: Computer-based
proofs are very difficult/tedious to check; Even in traditional proofs, reviewers
rarely check every step, instead
focusing mostly on the major points, and relying also on the author's track
record; In the end, they either believe the proof or not (according
to mathematics
historian Akihiro Kanamori "It's like osmosis; More and more
people say it's a proof and you believe them"); > s.a. computation.
Related Topics > see philosophy of science [explanations].
References
@ General: Takeuti 75; Schütte 77 [not standard framework]; Simmons 00 [III].
@ Simple: Solow 82; Pohlers 89; Hayes AS(07).
@ Related topics: Maclane Syn(97) [physicists and mathematics]; Hughes AM(06)
[combinatorics as opposed to syntax].
@ Proof by computer: Horgan SA(93)oct; MacKenzie 01; Woos 03; Simpson LMP(04)
[overview]; > s.a.
computation.
@ Quantum proofs: Aaronson & Kuperberg
qp/06 [vs classical proofs].
Main page – Abbreviations – Journals – Comments – Other
sites – Acknowledgements
Send feedback and suggestions to bombelli at olemiss.edu – Modified
11 jun 2008